Thursday, November 12, 2009

What the Flushing Toilet Can Tell About Corruption

I am currently attending an Online course named "Essentials of Anti-corruption", where we shall learn about how to define, identify, understand and hopefully combat corruption. The course is quite interesting and it is fun to discuss with people online you have never seen before. However, next week it is my turn for the weekly assignment and I am requested to write about the 'drivers' of corruption in a country which is up to my choice. Surprisingly, I chose Sierra Leone and started to collect information from the internet, when I found the following article, which was published on BBC Africa Newspage in January this year. It is a ver fun, but sadly also very true. And it makes you aware about the absolute paradox situation Sierra Leone is currently facing.

Enjoy, laugh, wonder, reflect and act!!

Can S Leone flush away corruption?


By Mark Doyle
BBC News, Freetown

It is not very often that a toilet sparks political debate.

And it is even rarer for a VIP ministerial toilet to be opened up for journalistic inspection.

We've got to stop the leakages

But a little over a year ago I began a journey in a ministerial bathroom that would take me down an unusual path of inquiry - and end up as a report on corruption for BBC News.

It all began in late 2007 when I travelled to Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone, for the inauguration of the then-recently elected president, Ernest Bai Koroma.

I had obtained a confidential report, commissioned by the incoming government, into official corruption.

President Koroma had come to power on a strong anti-corruption ticket and the report was one of his first initiatives.

I reported on the revelations in the (until-then) confidential study and quizzed President Koroma about his promises.

During that same trip in late 2007, I went to the top floor of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building to interview the newly-appointed Foreign Minister, Zainab Bangura.

To kick off the interview, I asked Mrs Bangura how she had found things when she took office. I was immediately treated to a tirade of complaints.

In the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building, the minister said, there was no cash, no pens and paper, no bulbs in the light sockets (which didn't matter much, because there was no fuel for the generator) and (here's where my journey begins) "No water - you can't flush the toilet because the water doesn't come up to my floor!"

I was incredulous - no water in the ministerial bathroom!

My journalistic antennae had sniffed something - and I decided to overcome my natural embarrassment.

"Could we," I tentatively asked, "have a look?"

So in we went to the ministerial toilet.

It was true. It didn't flush because there was no water in the pipes.

Delighted response

The minister's theme was serious. "We've got to stop the leakages," Mrs Bangura said, without a hint of irony.

"Stop the leakages?" I asked (we had by now left the bathroom).

Mrs Bangura said: "Stop the stealing! We've got to stop the stealing! We want to prove that there is at least one country in Africa that can work well."

When I sent the story to London, my BBC editors couldn't get enough of it.

On the radio, they played the clip about the toilet again and again - along with some of the more boring stuff about the report into corruption, of course.

I don't think I've ever had such a delighted response to a story from my bosses.

Mrs Bangura's theme had been that corruption and a lack of maintenance culture - "stealing", as she put it, more bluntly - had ruined Sierra Leone in general. And not just her toilet.

She and her colleagues were going to put things right, she said, from President Koroma down.

So when the cold began to bite in London, in the depths of winter 2008, my mind drifted to warmer and friendlier climes.

A thought occurred to me - I may even have been perched on a chilly British toilet seat at the time - that my editors might entertain a return trip to Sierra Leone.

Pushing at an open door

The idea would be to see how, a year on, President Koroma's anti-corruption campaign was going - and (here's the killer part in the sales pitch I gave the editors) to see if that ministerial toilet was now flushing.

I was pushing at an open door. The order went out: "Doyle! Get back to that toilet!"

The plane tickets were thrust upon me and I was heading for Sierra Leone before I knew it.

Once in Freetown, I visited the newly-strengthened Anti-Corruption Commission and its boss, Abdul Tejan Cole, who has mounted some serious investigations into graft.

Officials at the commission admit privately that they haven't yet caught a "big fish".

But they say they fully intend to do so - in order to convince Sierra Leoneans that they are serious in their work.

I again interviewed President Koroma, who said that any of his officials - "anyone", he emphasised strongly - suspected of corruption could be investigated by Mr Tejan Cole and his independent commission.

If they were found guilty they would be sacked, the president said, and he would protect no-one from prosecution.

Having done the weighty stuff, I then went back to call again on Mrs Bangura at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

"Minister," I began (with all the respect due to a senior government official), "the last time we met, you were kind enough to show me your ministerial toilet."

Embarrassment

I think the wily Mrs Bangura had seen this coming.

"The listeners would like to know," I continued a little pompously, "if your toilet is now flushing?"

She chuckled and stood up. We were on our way again into the small room.

She turned the tap.

And water came out.

Now, I'd be the last to conclude that the Sierra Leonean Foreign Minister's toilet is some sort of symbol of a revitalised nation.

The struggle against corruption in Sierra Leone will surely be long and hard.

If rich countries with almost limitless resources, like the United States or Britain, can't stamp out crimes like financial fraud - which, time and again, they have shown they cannot - what chance for little Sierra Leone?

My conclusion, rather, is that it's clear some people in the year-old Sierra Leonean government are trying to make the country turn a new leaf.

I didn't meet anyone during my trip, for example, who thought President Koroma was on the make.

But at the same time it is equally clear that suspicions remain about the probity of a number of other ministers and institutions.

The encouraging thing, I suppose, is that I can confidently report this fact because the Anti-Corruption Commission has published a series of detailed probes.

There's another reason why I can't conclude that Mrs Bangura's toilet is a conclusive symbol.

That's because my enquiries didn't stop at the ministerial convenience alone.

No, in the interests of investigative journalism, I visited another small room in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs building that is used by people of lesser standing.

My findings indicate that there is still much work to be done.

So if you are reading this, Madame Minister, it is my duty to report to you that there is at least one other toilet, not far from your office, that does not flush at all.


(Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7834228.stm)


Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Guidos Großmaul

Für alle Liebhaber der bissigen Kolumne und Zweifler der Personalentschiedungen bzgl. des neuen Kabinetts lässt sich der Spiegel über Dirk Niebel als Guidos Großmaul (Erscheinungsdatum: 2.11. / Seite 28) aus, die Süddeutsche stellt spöttisch lachend die Tanzbären und Koryphäen der neuen Koalition vor, und auch Spiegel Online macht sich kräftig über die Alleskönner lustig.
Nun heisst es abzuwarten, zu hoffen, dass die Schwarzseher nicht zu schwarz sehen und erstens alles anders kommt und zweitens als man denkt.

Monday, November 02, 2009

Welcome to the land of the free....now even if you are HIV-infected

Sorry guys, this time I post mainly in German, since I refer back to German articles. However, it is about the Obama's decisision to finally practically eradicate the law which forbids HIV-infected people to enter US-American territory.
Although I obviously welcome this decision so much, this is not a reason to celebrate. It is much more a reason to feel ashamed that such a law could exist for more than two decades. In a country, which claims to be the land of the free. Innovation is something else. Civil right, political rights....human rights are something else. Leadership is something else. Hegemony should be something else. Being a rolemodel is something else.
This is at least my opinion. What do you think? Please, share your opinion, I am curious to learn and reflect.

1987 wurde in den USA ein Gesetz verabschiedet, das HIV-Infizierten die Einreise verbietet. Das allein ist schon fast unglaublich. Noch unglaublicher ist es jedoch, dass dieses Gesetz 22 Jahre faktisch in Kraft war und immer noch ist. Ab 01.01.2010 wird es dieses Gesetz aber nicht mehr geben und nach über 2 Jahrzehnten wird es zumindest dem Gesetz diese staatliche Diskriminierung mehr geben.
Hintergrundinfos dazu zum Beispiel in diesem Spiegel-Online-Artikel und bei der Frankfurter Aidshilfe, die die Situation zum Zeitpunkt Mai 2009 beschreibt.

Ist die Abschaffung nun ein Grund zu Jubeln, zum Gratulieren, und zum Preisen der innovativen, toleranten Politik eines Präsidenten, der bereits den Friedensnobelpreis als Vorschusslorbeeren eingeheimst hat? Wohl kaum.
Versteht mich nicht falsch, ich bin unsagbar glücklich, dass Obama nun Präsident ist und ich halte ihn für einen fähigen Politiker und würde mir auch nicht anmaßen wollen, ihn an dieser Stelle zu kritisieren. Nichtsdestotrotz denke ich, das es Menschen und/ oder Organisationen gibt, die den Friedensnobelpreis eher verdient hätten. Egal, ich schweife ab. Zurück zum Dasein der HIV-Infizierten, die das Pech hatten, das Land of the free besuchen zu wollen, aber leider nicht reinzukommen. Denn ein Grund zu Feiern ist Obama's Entscheidung nicht, sondern eine längst überfällige Notwendigkeit.
In einem Land, das sich durch seine Politik und Außenwirkung gerne als Model für einen freien, demokratischen Staat darstellt, in dem Menschenrechte geachtet und gefördert werden, ist ein solches Gesetz ein trauriges Symbol von ambivalentem Verhalten. So ein Gesetz steht im Widerspruch zu jeglichen Hegemonie- und Supermachtansprüchen. Stigmatisierug, Marginalisierung, und soziale Ausschließung...genau solche Strukturen und Dynamiken werden mit einem solchen Gesetz unterstützt und verstärkt. Genau solche Strukturen und Dynamiken versucht die USA aber außerhalb ihres Territoriums z.B. durch die Kanäle der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit aufzuweichen und zu verändern. Paradox? Man mag es denken. Sicherheitsfanatismus? Bestimmt auch mit dabei. Unwissenheit? Ja. Desinteresse? Es könnte wohl unterstellt werden.
Wie auch immer man es nennen möchte, ich persönlich bin der Meinung, dass Obama hier keine Heldentat begangen hat (so wird es auch tatsächlich nicht gesehen), aber die Möglichkeit eröffnet hat, endlich für eine Realität zu sorgen, wie sie menschlich und in einem großen Teil der Welt auch schon vorherrschend ist.